This post is requested on behalf of a Lush Cosmetics campaign, and I support its aims, to raise awareness of the need to properly police wildlife crime. Vote for a police crime commissioner on the 15th November who wants to protect wildlife. Also people should consider the commissioners’ opinions towards strike laws, protest laws, freedom of speech, internet rights regarding content sharing and privacy etc. and how these are policed. If anyone has some good advice on who to vote for regarding these things please comment as I could do with some advice myself.
Did you know that on the 15th November there are Police and Crime Commissioner elections happening across England and Wales? The truth is these elections are completely under the radar, despite the soon to be elected commissioners having access to unprecedented power over constabulary funding.
Lush Ltd have launched the ‘No Cop Out For Wildlife Campaign’ calling for candidates to enforce the foxhunting ban and allocate proper resources to policing wildlife crime. And they need your help in telling people about the elections and the importance of voting for a wildlife-friendly Police Commissioner.
To get involved, Lush want you to join their social media hunting pack. They have assembled a bunch of tools to help you spread the word about wildlife-friendly candidates, from blogging to tweeting or creative competitions, there is a way you can support this campaign.
Come on over to https://wildlifecrime.lush.co.uk/get-involved and discover more about the elections and how together we can protect British wildlife.
I decided to test embedding Google Trends charts for the UK. I can’t figure out how to make the embedded charts look nicer but in the meantime, this is quite interesting.
Each chart shows what people are searching for in the last 7 days (or 30 days if there wasn’t much data) in particular, i.e. not the overall biggest search (which is always Facebook, BBC, Google etc!), but the biggest increase:
Advocacy (30 days)
Economics (30 days)
Internet and telecomms
Pets (30 days)
Reproductive rights (90 days)
Social sciences (30 days)
Workers’ rights (30 days)
There are a bunch of other categories but I’m less interested in those, and I’m not embedding everything!
Thanks to Brighton MP Caroline Lucas from the Green Party for her help on the day. For background you can read my statement along with links to other statements here.
Caroline Lucas says,
“Just before the Brighton Pride parade set off, a number of people who were marching under the Queers Against Cuts banner were prevented from taking up their pre-assigned place in the parade, and instead were forced to the back of the march, with suggestions that they might be made to leave the parade altogether. I immediately took this up with police and Pride officials, and along with Peter Tatchell, ensured that at least they could remain on the march.
I didn’t see the police kettle myself, since by then I was on the Green Party float, but I am deeply concerned to hear that this happened, and am taking it up with police and organisers. Pride should be a place where all who uphold LGBT rights are welcome, and where as well as celebrating what the LGBT community has achieved, we also focus on the threats and risks that remain to be challenged. The brutal financial cuts being meted out by this government are already undermining services for LGBT people and others, and a peaceful demonstration against the cuts seems entirely appropriate as part of Pride. It’s a terrible shame that an otherwise wonderful day for Pride was spoiled in this way “.
Below is my personal statement / account. Since publishing, other statements have also been written:
I formally registered the walking group Queers Against Cuts for the Brighton Pride Parade in July, paying the £60 fee out of my own pocket and from a donation from a local trade union. Members of the group were invited from local political groups, trade unions and activist communities, to march in solidarity together against government cuts to public services and jobs. Pride began in Stonewall in 1969 as a protest against police harassment of gay and trans people in New York. As Government cuts to jobs and public services are affecting LGBTQ people disproportionately, for many reasons, this is an important reason for us to march against cuts in pride today. In my application email I explained that we would be a collective of different groups and individuals marching together, to check that this was acceptable with Pride organisers, and my application was accepted. On Thursday 30 August I was sent the parade running order (read that here: 2012 Parade Lamp Post Order) and we were pleased to discover we’d be between the National Union of Teachers, who also had an anti-cuts theme, and performance group Champagne Anarchists, at post 50.
Last Wednesday I received a call from Trevor Edwards, pride organiser, who informed me the police had been in touch with concerns about our group being a protest. Trevor said he had reassured the police we were all formally registered and there was no reason to treat us differently.
Last Thursday I received a call from the Police Protest Liaison Officer PC Frank to introduce herself and to say good luck with our banner making (i.e. to let me know she was reading our Facebook Group) and to ask for my email to send me information (which hasn’t arrived yet). I explained I had formally registered the group for the parade with no need for different treatment from the other groups.
Today I turned up to register and collected my number 50 sign (see that here). Here I was told we’d been moved to the back, but as they didn’t know why and didn’t have the paperwork for number 58, they said we could stay in our original position and they would inform the mayor the order was as originally planned when we went past.
So we all got together behind NUT at point 50 who were pleased we were marching with them and we shared accessories!
Then a Pride Organiser came and told us we were in the wrong position and had to move to the back. I informed him that the registration people had said we could stay where we were, showed him my official ’50′ sign so he went away.
Another Pride Organiser came and I explained again, and he said we were fine where we were and could stay.
Another Pride Organiser came and said we had to move back, and when we asked why, became very aggessive and threatened if we didn’t move we would get thrown off the parade. I asked him to check with the previous organisers who had said we could stay.
Then a police officer came with the final Pride Organiser and said we had all been thrown off the march and had to be removed. At this point I broke down in tears as I had put so much hard work into organising the group. At this point I asked everybody to move to the back but was told we still couldn’t join the parade.
Then Caroline Lucas from the Green Party came and spoke to the police and Pride Organisers in solidarity with us. Finally we were allowed to march.
About 100 yards into the march on Marine Parade, some latecomers to our group arrived, including a breast-feeding woman with her baby and others with children. I was told by the Pride Organiser that if I didn’t make them leave our whole group would be blocked. I explained I couldn’t force people to go anywhere. Suddenly a row of police on horseback and foot ran into the middle of our group, and I was told I had to personally identify who was officially in the group to be let through. As this was mainly organised online I didn’t know everybody’s faces. I managed to get most people out of the kettle but around 15 people were left behind. Again I was in tears and others were close to it, having been part of the group organising from the start and suddenly kettled for no reason.
[edit: just read that police are denying a kettle. Here is a photo of the kettle with Queers Against Cuts banner in the middle of it:]
Finally we continued to march. Throughout the parade, any friends or latecomers who tried to join us were pulled from the parade by police. I managed to identify some friends to keep them in with us but others were blocked from joining us.
I’m very hurt and upset at how I was treated and spoken to by Pride, how the rest of the group were treated, how we were given no reason for our sudden relegation to the back, and our mistreatment by the police. Being surrounded by police on horses and on foot was unnecessary and too heavy handed. I was told other latecomers were allowed to join other groups such as The Conservatives. I believe the only reason we were treated this way is because we had political banners which challenged the status quo of a corporate sponsorship of Pride, and it has really shown the lack of political solidarity from Pride Organisers.
This is my personal statement of my experience but I will be writing a formal statement from the Socialist Party of which I am a member, and asking groups and individuals to sign it once I get chance.
Well, this has inspired me to make the group bigger and even more organised next year! Who’s with me?
[Here we are marching along just before half of us got kettled:]